Skip to Content
Advertisement
Health

Does Nurture Trump Nature in Disease Risk Prediction?

Social determinants of health can match or exceed genetic risk of common diseases

With all of the focus on genetics and disease, it’s easy to forget that humans are more than just the sum of our genes. A new study published in The American Journal of Human Genetics suggests social and environmental factors could play an equal or greater role than genetics in predicting the risk of common diseases. 

Featured Video

To investigate the multifactorial causes of disease, researchers from the Mount Sinai School of Medicine relied on data from the All of Us biobank, which collects information and biological samples from more than 400,000 individuals. They also analyzed survey responses measuring more than 100 social and environmental conditions, which included many risk factors that aren’t usually examined. 

“Some risk factors, such as smoking, have been studied extensively for decades,” study co-author Abhijith Biji said in a statement. “What is especially intriguing is that we also observed associations involving factors like loneliness.”

Read more: “For Every Patient Their Own Drug

By comparing the data to the incidence of six common ailments (asthma, chronic kidney disease, coronary heart disease, high cholesterol, breast cancer, and prostate cancer), they found that incorporating social measures of health boosted their ability to predict disease risk above genetics alone. Additionally, the social, behavioral, and environmental factors seemed to contribute as much or more to the risk of four of the six illnesses studied (asthma, chronic kidney disease, high cholesterol, and coronary heart disease).

“Genes are an important part of the equation, but they do not determine destiny,” study co-author Samira Asgari explained. “We found that the circumstances of people’s lives—their environments, behaviors, and social experiences—can contribute as much as genetics to predicting disease risk.” 

Still, the researchers stress that these findings aren’t about determining the single cause of any of these conditions. Instead, they highlight the need for more comprehensive models of disease risk, that take into account the context in which genes and other factors interact. 

Or as Asgari put it, “To truly understand health, we have to look at the whole person, not just their DNA.”

Enjoying Nautilus? Subscribe to our free newsletter.

Lead image: lembergvector / Adobe Stock

Advertisement

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Health

Explore Health

Can the Sugar Molecules That Coat Our Cells Predict Our Health?

Glycans, once ignored, may revolutionize medicine

June 23, 2026

Is This the King of GLP-1s?

A new meta-analysis stacks three leading GLP-1 medications against each other

Here’s Why Our Walking Gets Slower as We Age

And the best ways to prevent it

June 9, 2026

Your Saliva Knows How Sleepy You Are

Sleep-deprived? Spit here.

June 8, 2026

How Right-Wing Politics Make You Physically Ill

Over the past two decades, right-wing ideology has become associated with less trust in medicine—and poorer health

May 29, 2026