Skip to Content
Advertisement
Psychology

This Is How People Who Use Emojis at Work Are Perceived

šŸ‘or šŸ‘Ž?

12:00 PM CDT on April 9, 2026

For better or worse, emojis are now part of the workplace. With remote work on the rise, and face-to-face office communication declining, many employees have been robbed of the nonverbal cues that usually convey mood and tone. Emojis could help bridge that gap, but how useful are they really?

Featured Video

Psychologists from the University of Ottawa in Canada paired positive, negative, and neutral instant messages with positive, negative, or no emoji and asked participants to rate the competence of the sender and the appropriateness of the message. (If you’re curious which emojis they used, this sunny face was the positive one: šŸ˜€; while this little grump was the negative one: 😠.) They published their findings in Collabra.

ā€œNo emojisā€ was the clear winner (sorry emoji users). People rated the sender competence and appropriateness of messages without emojis higher than those with them. Positive emojis did enhance perceptions of competence when paired with positive or neutral messages, but only compared to negative emojis. Negative emojis were always seen as inappropriate and made senders seem less competent, but especially when paired with a positive or neutral message (and understandably so).Ā 

Read more: ā€œWhy You Need Emojiā€

Advertisement

They also discovered some gender dynamics at play. Interestingly, women judged emojis sent by other women as less appropriate than if they were sent by men. These findings mirror studies of face-to-face office communications. Previous research has found women are judged as less competent when expressing negative emotions and also report experiencing more incivility from other women than from men. In this study, researchers say women may have judged other women more negatively for ā€œviolating gendered expectations of ā€˜appropriate’ emotional expression for women in the workplace.ā€

Of course, the study does have some limitations. Because the instant messages were simulated, they aren’t able to fully capture the nuances of real workplace communications and relationships. Similarly, the study’s narrow emoji vocabulary (šŸ˜€ and 😠), represents only a tiny sliver of the broader range of emojis used in the workplace. Still, it’s an important baseline for future research.Ā 

For now, though, the next time you’re asking yourself whether you should cap off a Slack message with a smiley face, the answer is šŸ™…ā€ā™‚ļø.

Enjoying Nautilus? Subscribe to our free newsletter.

Advertisement

Lead image: Sohag sarkar / Adobe Stock

Advertisement

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

Related Stories

Envy at the Ballot Box

Majority voting may make us less willing to tolerate advantages for others

September 3, 2026

I’m Part of the Team Writing the Next Bible of Psychiatry—For the First Time, the DSM Will Use Biology to Understand MentalĀ Disorders

Part of the challenge of finding a biomarker for mental illness is the environment’s significant influence

August 29, 2026

How We Decide Who Deserves Our Help

Cooperation is a double-edged sword

August 26, 2026

Here’s Where Our Memories Go as We Age

It’s more nuanced than you think

August 24, 2026

Are You in Danger of Becoming a Robot?

How interacting with social chatbots could reduce your ā€œpersonhoodā€

August 21, 2026

How Our Perceptions of Aging Can Affect Our Social Lives

Is it as easy as ā€œmind over matter?ā€

August 18, 2026