Skip to Content
Advertisement
Genetics

Reclaiming Samples of Ourselves

Artist Heather Dewey-Hagborg explores the ethics of human specimen collections in <i>Is a Biobank a Home?</i>

When we have blood drawn or tissue biopsied, where do the leftovers go? A surprising amount of them don’t get discarded, but instead wind up in vast repositories known as biobanks, to be used for research. Artist and biohacker Heather Dewey-Hagborg sought to reclaim her cellular sovereignty by tracking the fate of her samples. The result is her installation, Is a Biobank a Home? 

Featured Video

There, visitors encounter fluorescent-lit shelves packed with “blood”-filled vials. From speakers, recordings of Dewey-Hagborg’s requests for information about her own samples from various medical institutions—including the hospital where she was born—are mashed with crashing percussion to create Correspondence Song.

Viewers must squeeze through the walls of blood, arranged in a claustrophobic spiral, until they reach the window. Here, a stained-glass piece glints in the sunlight: Self-Portrait (Pathology). Upon closer inspection, one notices the collage contains faint purple splotches—slides of Dewey-Hagborg’s biopsied tissue that she was able to obtain. 

In recent decades, scientists and biotechnology companies have begun reckoning with the injustices illuminated by the case of Henrietta Lacks—a cervical cancer patient at Johns Hopkins Hospital whose family wasn’t informed for decades that her cells were widely disseminated within the medical community, earning companies billions of dollars. This shift inspired a proposed change to the rule that protects human subjects in federally funded research: requiring written consent from sample donors for future use in medical research. 

Advertisement

But in 2017, this proposal was abandoned by federal officials after lobbying from biomedical and university research groups, who claimed that it would come with major costs, logistical hurdles, and potential privacy risks for donors. More recently, the rise (and fall) of at-home DNA testing kits has introduced another consent conundrum: What will happen to the genetic information from more than 15 million 23andMe users after the company is sold off to the highest bidder?

While it’s easy to forget the pieces of us that are quickly swabbed, snipped, or drawn into a vial, either in a hospital or our own living room, Is a Biobank a Home? reminds us that we live on in these fragments locked away in storage—and all these bits of us deserve a reunion.

Is a Biobank a Home? is on view at Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum through August 10.

Lead photo by Ann Sunwoo / Smithsonian Institution

Advertisement
Advertisement

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Genetics

Explore Genetics

What Do You Get When You Cross a Tardigrade with a Space Pioneer?

A little genetic engineering could help future space settlers survive the challenges of off-world living

February 27, 2026

New Gene Discovery Could Postpone the Bananapocalypse

Bananas could get wiped out, it’s happened before

February 23, 2026

Was the Human Genome Forged by Fire?

New research into burn-response genes shows evidence of accelerated evolution

February 6, 2026

When German Shepherds Got Their Cursed Genes

DNA from museum specimens help detail the genetic bottleneck

January 30, 2026

Your Lifespan May Depend Much More on Genes Than Previously Thought

Research published today shows a bigger impact of genetics on aging than previously thought

January 29, 2026

The Strawberry Is a Frankenfruit

New research reveals the genetic history of the cultivated strawberry

January 23, 2026